Those numbers aren't even remotely accurate tbh - Your chain value was fairly close to SR's when they declared war.chrisl7605 wrote: ↑5 years agoI'm confused.
You guys seem to be impressed by your war efforts.
RB/RL/GLD had a combined value of like 2.5-3bil
SR+Flop had a combined 7bil chain value and youre bragging about the damage you've caused?
Dont forget that you declared thus dropping our starting war value by like 20% lol
Either way I'm glad you guys are enjoying yourselves but dont fool yourselves into thinking your war efforts are impressive when you decided not to declare on the chain with similar value.
SR/DEMK/NSG/FFLOP/LaCN vs RL/RB/GLD/NWO
Moderator: Moderator
-
- Player
- Posts: 75
- Joined: 5 years ago
- Has thanked: 4 times
- Been thanked: 9 times
Re: SR/DEMK/NSG/FFLOP vs RL/RB/GLD/NWO
Re: SR/DEMK/NSG/FFLOP vs RL/RB/GLD/NWO
Numbers aren't even close indeed...brandonito wrote: ↑5 years ago
Those numbers aren't even remotely accurate tbh - Your chain value was fairly close to SR's when they declared war.
Maybe George can provide us numbers which are a bit closer to the truth?
Re: SR/DEMK/NSG/FFLOP vs RL/RB/GLD/NWO
Unfortunately the closest values we have are from the 21st of June. About 2 weeks before we declared.
https://gyazo.com/64448d2f54e82e93347a0cbeb9c31f80
I'm sure SR had a small lead at the 4th of July, but certainly not the lead chris say's we had...
https://gyazo.com/64448d2f54e82e93347a0cbeb9c31f80
I'm sure SR had a small lead at the 4th of July, but certainly not the lead chris say's we had...
- HaRdHouse
- Player
- Posts: 54
- Joined: 5 years ago
- Location: Paradise
- Alliance: SR
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 9 times
- Contact:
Re: SR/DEMK/NSG/FFLOP vs RL/RB/GLD/NWO
All I keep seeing is: "SR is too big" or "SR cheats". Where are the arguments? I wanna see facts, not words
Guys, don't forget that you also had members:
RL: 40
RB: 42
Glads: 28
LGC: 21
NWO: 12
+ the inactives ones and so on.
It's not our fault that some left you when this started. Don't start and cry here, and take it as it should.
You guys burned my account in the day I sold. If I didn't done that, I would have lost a ton of gold. I admit and I give you that. Great effort in there.
Let's keep it real, please.
Alex
Guys, don't forget that you also had members:
RL: 40
RB: 42
Glads: 28
LGC: 21
NWO: 12
+ the inactives ones and so on.
It's not our fault that some left you when this started. Don't start and cry here, and take it as it should.
You guys burned my account in the day I sold. If I didn't done that, I would have lost a ton of gold. I admit and I give you that. Great effort in there.
Let's keep it real, please.
Alex
Check out my Fiverr gigs: https://www.fiverr.com/hardhouse
-
- Player
- Posts: 91
- Joined: 5 years ago
- Been thanked: 13 times
Re: SR/DEMK/NSG/FFLOP vs RL/RB/GLD/NWO
Good numbers. But are we really going to include LGC/TOF? A chain that hasnt warred in 6 years and were only with us in a growth deal? I specifically left them out in my original post.Aggie wrote: ↑5 years ago Unfortunately the closest values we have are from the 21st of June. About 2 weeks before we declared.
https://gyazo.com/64448d2f54e82e93347a0cbeb9c31f80
I'm sure SR had a small lead at the 4th of July, but certainly not the lead chris say's we had...
ny numbers were slightly off but I was also under on the value of your chain.
How much did Neo/Flop chain account for? Another 2 tril for your side?
So 7.5tril value vs 4 tril value.
-800,000,000 (20 %) to start considering you guys declared.
-
- Player
- Posts: 91
- Joined: 5 years ago
- Been thanked: 13 times
Re: SR/DEMK/NSG/FFLOP vs RL/RB/GLD/NWO
If including lgc/tof makes you feel better then by all means include them.HaRdHouse wrote: ↑5 years ago All I keep seeing is: "SR is too big" or "SR cheats". Where are the arguments? I wanna see facts, not words
Guys, don't forget that you also had members:
RL: 40
RB: 42
Glads: 28
LGC: 21
NWO: 12
+ the inactives ones and so on.
It's not our fault that some left you when this started. Don't start and cry here, and take it as it should.
You guys burned my account in the day I sold. If I didn't done that, I would have lost a ton of gold. I admit and I give you that. Great effort in there.
Let's keep it real, please.
Alex
But those living in reality know they havent warred in 6 years and wernt going to start now.
- HaRdHouse
- Player
- Posts: 54
- Joined: 5 years ago
- Location: Paradise
- Alliance: SR
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 9 times
- Contact:
Re: SR/DEMK/NSG/FFLOP vs RL/RB/GLD/NWO
chrisl7605 wrote: ↑5 years agoIf including lgc/tof makes you feel better then by all means include them.HaRdHouse wrote: ↑5 years ago All I keep seeing is: "SR is too big" or "SR cheats". Where are the arguments? I wanna see facts, not words
Guys, don't forget that you also had members:
RL: 40
RB: 42
Glads: 28
LGC: 21
NWO: 12
+ the inactives ones and so on.
It's not our fault that some left you when this started. Don't start and cry here, and take it as it should.
You guys burned my account in the day I sold. If I didn't done that, I would have lost a ton of gold. I admit and I give you that. Great effort in there.
Let's keep it real, please.
Alex
But those living in reality know they havent warred in 6 years and wernt going to start now.
Yes, I agree with you that they didn't warred in ages, but they gave you growth before war, right?
Check out my Fiverr gigs: https://www.fiverr.com/hardhouse
- HaRdHouse
- Player
- Posts: 54
- Joined: 5 years ago
- Location: Paradise
- Alliance: SR
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 9 times
- Contact:
Re: SR/DEMK/NSG/FFLOP vs RL/RB/GLD/NWO
ITIT (not active)
Check out my Fiverr gigs: https://www.fiverr.com/hardhouse
-
- Player
- Posts: 60
- Joined: 5 years ago
- Alliance: Gladiators
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 4 times
Re: SR/DEMK/NSG/FFLOP vs RL/RB/GLD/NWO
I don't know where your doing your math. Without LGC thats 122 with 143. You can't tell me your side of the war isn't close to 100 people bigger. We got 123 members in SR alone, then throw in:HaRdHouse wrote: ↑5 years ago All I keep seeing is: "SR is too big" or "SR cheats". Where are the arguments? I wanna see facts, not words
Guys, don't forget that you also had members:
RL: 40
RB: 42
Glads: 28
LGC: 21
NWO: 12
+ the inactives ones and so on.
It's not our fault that some left you when this started. Don't start and cry here, and take it as it should.
You guys burned my account in the day I sold. If I didn't done that, I would have lost a ton of gold. I admit and I give you that. Great effort in there.
Let's keep it real, please.
Alex
DEMK: 38
FLOP: 28
Big Trey Deuce Gang (Great Name BTW Neo): 16
= 205 members
+ Other Miscellaneous alliances with FLOP members
+ your inactives which is probably not as much as RBs but not a massive difference.
So as you said, let's keep it real.
However, I am not saying its any excuse to be losing this war, because Glads beat DEMK when we had 10-15 less members at the start of the war. NSG included in that total. (They're aren't an alliance anymore btw, so idk why they're in the title of this topic.)
- Neophyte
- Player
- Posts: 22
- Joined: 5 years ago
- Location: Denmark
- Has thanked: 12 times
- Been thanked: 2 times
- Contact:
Re: SR/DEMK/NSG/FFLOP vs RL/RB/GLD/NWO
Mine is bigger..
A1 since Day 1..
.. for Rez and Wes. Never forgotten.
.. for Rez and Wes. Never forgotten.
Spoiler
Show
[23:54] TheBigCheese-RB: if it were up to me we would've leveled your entire alliance already