SR/DEMK/NSG/FFLOP/LaCN vs RL/RB/GLD/NWO

[HaRdHouse]

All I keep seeing is: "SR is too big" or "SR cheats". Where are the arguments? I wanna see facts, not words
Guys, don't forget that you also had members:
RL: 40
RB: 42
Glads: 28
LGC: 21
NWO: 12
+ the inactives ones and so on.

It's not our fault that some left you when this started. Don't start and cry here, and take it as it should.
You guys burned my account in the day I sold. If I didn't done that, I would have lost a ton of gold. I admit and I give you that. Great effort in there.

Let's keep it real, please.

Alex

I don't know where your doing your math. Without LGC thats 122 with 143. You can't tell me your side of the war isn't close to 100 people bigger. We got 123 members in SR alone, then throw in:

DEMK: 38
FLOP: 28
Big Trey Deuce Gang (Great Name BTW Neo): 16
= 205 members

+ Other Miscellaneous alliances with FLOP members
+ your inactives which is probably not as much as RBs but not a massive difference.

So as you said, let's keep it real.

However, I am not saying its any excuse to be losing this war, because Glads beat DEMK when we had 10-15 less members at the start of the war. NSG included in that total. (They're aren't an alliance anymore btw, so idk why they're in the title of this topic.)

Ok. So your excuse about loosing this war is: "SR to big" right?
Tell that to your regular members who expect more action on field not on forums

[bloodpirate]

lol, another farm gone .. how am i to grow?

i would blame RL/RB/GLD/NWO on loosing the war by NWO getting me involved. hahahaha. pat myself on the back to re inflate my ego

[chrisl7605]

All I keep seeing is: "SR is too big" or "SR cheats". Where are the arguments? I wanna see facts, not words
Guys, don't forget that you also had members:
RL: 40
RB: 42
Glads: 28
LGC: 21
NWO: 12
+ the inactives ones and so on.

It's not our fault that some left you when this started. Don't start and cry here, and take it as it should.
You guys burned my account in the day I sold. If I didn't done that, I would have lost a ton of gold. I admit and I give you that. Great effort in there.

Let's keep it real, please.

Alex

If including lgc/tof makes you feel better then by all means include them.

But those living in reality know they havent warred in 6 years and wernt going to start now.

Yes, I agree with you that they didn't warred in ages, but they gave you growth before war, right?

We are talking about starting chain values and how yours was about double.

[HaRdHouse]

If including lgc/tof makes you feel better then by all means include them.

But those living in reality know they havent warred in 6 years and wernt going to start now.

Yes, I agree with you that they didn't warred in ages, but they gave you growth before war, right?

We are talking about starting chain values and how yours was about double.

Aggie posted the values earlier before war.

[JayAlt]

Mine is bigger..

thats what she said

[CrazyDave]

Mine is bigger..

thats what she said

NSFW

Spoiler

Show

[ROLYAT]

All I keep seeing is: "SR is too big" or "SR cheats". Where are the arguments? I wanna see facts, not words
Guys, don't forget that you also had members:
RL: 40
RB: 42
Glads: 28
LGC: 21
NWO: 12
+ the inactives ones and so on.

It's not our fault that some left you when this started. Don't start and cry here, and take it as it should.
You guys burned my account in the day I sold. If I didn't done that, I would have lost a ton of gold. I admit and I give you that. Great effort in there.

Let's keep it real, please.

Alex

I don't know where your doing your math. Without LGC thats 122 with 143. You can't tell me your side of the war isn't close to 100 people bigger. We got 123 members in SR alone, then throw in:

DEMK: 38
FLOP: 28
Big Trey Deuce Gang (Great Name BTW Neo): 16
= 205 members

+ Other Miscellaneous alliances with FLOP members
+ your inactives which is probably not as much as RBs but not a massive difference.

So as you said, let's keep it real.

However, I am not saying its any excuse to be losing this war, because Glads beat DEMK when we had 10-15 less members at the start of the war. NSG included in that total. (They're aren't an alliance anymore btw, so idk why they're in the title of this topic.)

Ok. So your excuse about loosing this war is: "SR to big" right?
Tell that to your regular members who expect more action on field not on forums

Yes, I'm sure GLD "regular" members are very upset after victory over DEMK. Good point.

[HaRdHouse]

This is not a GLD vs DEMK thread

[TheFay]

There is a war?

[chrisl7605]

Yes, I agree with you that they didn't warred in ages, but they gave you growth before war, right?

We are talking about starting chain values and how yours was about double.

Aggie posted the values earlier before war.

SR 5.2 Tril
RL/RB/LGC/TOF = 5.2 tril
AG = 4.6 tril

flop = 2.0 tril

LGC/tof = 1tril
Yes, and this is the last time ill repeat myself. There's no point in including LGC/ToF unless you're trying to feel better about yourself, they were never going to war.

LGC/ToF made up about a tril of the originally post chain value.

which would have put our chain value at about 4tril.

Not only did you guys declare as SR 5.2tril value (i assume DEMK is included in that total) you also declared with half of AG (flop and neos group of rouges) so thats another 2tril chain value on your side. Bringing your total value to 7.2tril (which is a low estimate).

Tack on the fact that you declared, we would have started the war with a minimum 20% loss on that 4tril value(total daily loss is 30%). Which would bring our starting chain value 3.2tril (a high estimate).

So at most, after 30 minutes of war, its fair to say that the war was 7.2tril vs 3.2tril value.

That being said the only person who lost in this war is Bon and the only winner seems to be Dank.

Also funny to see BP join in this war when he was complaining in our last thread about players quiting over war.