Kings Of Chaos :: Forums

chrisl7605 wrote: ↑5 years ago
Also funny to see BP join in this war when he was complaining in our last thread about players quiting over war.

bloodpirate wrote: ↑5 years ago

chrisl7605 wrote: ↑5 years ago
Also funny to see BP join in this war when he was complaining in our last thread about players quiting over war.

i had no real choice.

13 officers total | page 1 of 2
4 officers logged in today

NWO dragged me into it, litterally. they almost put a BPM to my head and forced me. are you going to blame me for

ITIT (not active)
GremRyda (not active)

so be it. i was farming/sabbing who i could. funny how one player gets blamed for what 100 plus players are doing.

JayAlt wrote: ↑5 years ago
at least your standing up for yourself and not letting people just raid and sab your alliance with no retaliation. *cough* *cough*

chrisl7605 wrote: ↑5 years ago SR 5.2 Tril
RL/RB/LGC/TOF = 5.2 tril
AG = 4.6 tril

flop = 2.0 tril

LGC/tof = 1tril
Yes, and this is the last time ill repeat myself. There's no point in including LGC/ToF unless you're trying to feel better about yourself, they were never going to war.

LGC/ToF made up about a tril of the originally post chain value.

which would have put our chain value at about 4tril.

Not only did you guys declare as SR 5.2tril value (i assume DEMK is included in that total) you also declared with half of AG (flop and neos group of rouges) so thats another 2tril chain value on your side. Bringing your total value to 7.2tril (which is a low estimate).

Tack on the fact that you declared, we would have started the war with a minimum 20% loss on that 4tril value(total daily loss is 30%). Which would bring our starting chain value 3.2tril (a high estimate).

So at most, after 30 minutes of war, its fair to say that the war was 7.2tril vs 3.2tril value.

That being said the only person who lost in this war is Bon and the only winner seems to be Dank.

Also funny to see BP join in this war when he was complaining in our last thread about players quiting over war.

Aggie wrote: ↑5 years ago

chrisl7605 wrote: ↑5 years ago SR 5.2 Tril
RL/RB/LGC/TOF = 5.2 tril
AG = 4.6 tril

flop = 2.0 tril

LGC/tof = 1tril
Yes, and this is the last time ill repeat myself. There's no point in including LGC/ToF unless you're trying to feel better about yourself, they were never going to war.

LGC/ToF made up about a tril of the originally post chain value.

which would have put our chain value at about 4tril.

Not only did you guys declare as SR 5.2tril value (i assume DEMK is included in that total) you also declared with half of AG (flop and neos group of rouges) so thats another 2tril chain value on your side. Bringing your total value to 7.2tril (which is a low estimate).

Tack on the fact that you declared, we would have started the war with a minimum 20% loss on that 4tril value(total daily loss is 30%). Which would bring our starting chain value 3.2tril (a high estimate).

So at most, after 30 minutes of war, its fair to say that the war was 7.2tril vs 3.2tril value.

That being said the only person who lost in this war is Bon and the only winner seems to be Dank.

Also funny to see BP join in this war when he was complaining in our last thread about players quiting over war.

And this is the last time I repeat myself.
LGC/ToF are included because they provided you a LOT of growth. They are also responsible for your value and we warred them the first day and they retalliated. So yes they warred, even if it was for a day or 2.

And maybe you care to explain how you get to a trillion value for LGC/ToF? A bit of substantiation would be nice.

Also, we didn't declare with half of AG (flop and neos group of rouges). So that's NOT another 2Tril?!? chain value on our side. They decided to jump in later. So that doesn't bring our chain value to an 'estimated' 7.2Tril.

And the assumption we managed to max ALL your players in the first strike would be the biggest joke in your entire post here man... Especially the bigger values were far away from being maxed, and I higly doubt the people that were maxable were actually maxed.

The only thing I agree with you on are the credits to Dank. He's holding up pretty good, and by far the most experienced warmachine.
If you all had listened to half he said, you would have been able to at least put up a decent fight!

HaRdHouse wrote: ↑5 years ago So next age if SR will be in RB/RL/GLD & friends situation and you guys declare on us, I can use the same crying motive? "You guys too big?' or "You have more value" ?
Just asking..

Aggie wrote: ↑5 years ago Ohw, and because you don't have the numbers it was never going to be a decent fight?
Think about that when you decide to sab a main or first trickle over a missed hit... Twice! Thinking that you were going to get away with it is just naive.

It's not our fault we have the numbers and value. I guess you have pissed off too many this era. And see the result.

chrisl7605 wrote: ↑5 years ago I enjoy strategic wars like we had with DEMK.