SR/DEMK/NSG/FFLOP/LaCN vs RL/RB/GLD/NWO
Moderator: Moderator
Re: SR/DEMK/NSG/FFLOP vs RL/RB/GLD/NWO
like with all "wars" it does get boring anf time comsuming after a while and the sun calls to a lot of ppl and holidays ....i dont mind a good wee war with good nature on both sides and for myself i knew this war would be hard and almost impossible to win but as long as i can hold my head up and say i tried thats ok for me and yes Squishy i understand what ur saying war can teach a lot of game play but then every era brings new tactics into play and only thing i didnt like was fflop who have been sworn emenies of SR and have for ages joining with SR .....that i cant get my head around lol
Re: SR/DEMK/NSG/FFLOP vs RL/RB/GLD/NWO
It seems you are missing the point I was trying to make. BP said that it feels a bit lopsided, so I pointed out the numbers. Wars are about 50-75% effort and 50-25% numbers -- your alliance can put in the most effort and still lose because they dont have the numbers to effectively bring a target down. Its simple math, if you can get 50% of people to mass one target, who is going to have more damage done to them? There is a reason Dank has been the main target and its not because he is the biggest account, could it be that he puts in more effort? Yes.Squishy wrote: ↑5 years agowars have been and always will be framed as whatever suits the side speaking. if you lead in raid damage you say raids are what wins if your laying down more sab damage you based winning off sabs. and on the flipside if you feel as if your not making any progress you find a a reason why your not losing, your too small, you are on vacation. not saying any of the reason for winning or losing is wrong im just saying again most of the outlooks are framed by what works best for those looking.Fin wrote: ↑5 years ago123 vs 191.. seemed to be lopsided from the start. GLD will continue to fight the good fight. Seems SR and co know we are the real threat seeing as Dank has been main target for quite awhilebloodpirate wrote: ↑5 years ago Name Members Power Rank
Rising Brotherhood 44 10.68 10
Gladiators 28 5.89 15
RelentlessLegacy 37 5.76 16
N.W.O. 14 2.73 18
vs
Sweet Revenge 120 137.88 1
FFLOP 33 24.45 4
DEMK 33 15.04 7
NSG 5 0.73 27
am i missing something, or is this battle getting a bit lopsided? who will NWO drag into it next? any surrender terms been sent out?
maybe rb rl should surrender to sr fflop and let glad nwo keep warring demk nsg bp
just a quick survey, is any other alliance farming rb rl glad nwo besides sr fflop demk nsg me? because their only two bigs left won't be approving anyone for any infraction.
with that being said it does feel like there is even less activity from the other side now, and while the war is still a focus its more of a background thing in a sense that there is more time to do other things like recruit and plan for next era.
the war has been fun and its been great for fflop, brought us closer together with some of the newer members got people excited in playing and its looking like we are going to leave this war with more people then when it started.
i will be the first to admit i am not the best player at this game and for me personally like all wars it has given me an opportunity to learn. i got to learn not just from the brilliant minds on our side but also from the otherside as well. so for me this war has been great.
so if you want to sit around and just complain about the numbers game thats fine i get that but there is alot more to look at here then just member counts because after all its not the size of the dog in the fight its the size of the fight int he dog, so if you got a size issue perhaps you really should be looking within.
tl;dr -- I am not sitting and complaining about numbers. We had a great war going against DEMK and it was easier for either side to manage because it was very close in numbers / account size. GLD will always fight with passion, even if its an uphill battle.
-
- Player
- Posts: 820
- Joined: 5 years ago
- Has thanked: 43 times
- Been thanked: 48 times
Re: SR/DEMK/NSG/FFLOP vs RL/RB/GLD/NWO
could you imagine the numbers after a week of SR all acting like DEMK or GLD? rb and company would be decimated. should thank SR for not being a war chain. what i am saying is.. sr and fflop chains, got 150 people to raid dank and thebigcheese every day for a week. over 5k raids a day would hurt. ALOT
for example, i just did thebigcheese .. 8995 of his mercs. plus damage to da. if 150 people did that, 1.3m plus mercs/soldiers. BOOM gone. da damaged so bad it would be scrap and he would turn into a koc farm.
for example, i just did thebigcheese .. 8995 of his mercs. plus damage to da. if 150 people did that, 1.3m plus mercs/soldiers. BOOM gone. da damaged so bad it would be scrap and he would turn into a koc farm.
-
- Player
- Posts: 91
- Joined: 5 years ago
- Been thanked: 13 times
Re: SR/DEMK/NSG/FFLOP vs RL/RB/GLD/NWO
Glads being bullies is a common misconception. People consistently sab our members for bs low hits, we havent declared a war since at least the first Era. Sometimes we do get rouges in our chain like every other alliance does but for the most part our members keep to ourselves.bloodpirate wrote: ↑5 years ago could you imagine the numbers after a week of SR all acting like DEMK or GLD? rb and company would be decimated. should thank SR for not being a war chain. what i am saying is.. sr and fflop chains, got 150 people to raid dank and thebigcheese every day for a week. over 5k raids a day would hurt. ALOT
When it comes to play style we are BY FAR the least greedy alliance in the game. We've given you, TGF, Flop, and a slew of others our growth and have asked for almost nothing in retun.
Yes we troll, and yes we do sab targets/players when they make blatantly racist comments but we never actively seek to war chains that our half our size.
-
- Player
- Posts: 820
- Joined: 5 years ago
- Has thanked: 43 times
- Been thanked: 48 times
Re: SR/DEMK/NSG/FFLOP vs RL/RB/GLD/NWO
i could almost say the same of FoD .. but a few minor differences.
-
- Player
- Posts: 75
- Joined: 5 years ago
- Has thanked: 4 times
- Been thanked: 9 times
Re: SR/DEMK/NSG/FFLOP vs RL/RB/GLD/NWO
Since when have FFLoP been sworn enemies of SR?Kaya wrote: ↑5 years ago like with all "wars" it does get boring anf time comsuming after a while and the sun calls to a lot of ppl and holidays ....i dont mind a good wee war with good nature on both sides and for myself i knew this war would be hard and almost impossible to win but as long as i can hold my head up and say i tried thats ok for me and yes Squishy i understand what ur saying war can teach a lot of game play but then every era brings new tactics into play and only thing i didnt like was fflop who have been sworn emenies of SR and have for ages joining with SR .....that i cant get my head around lol
- Spiderwoman_LaCN
- Donor
- Posts: 25
- Joined: 5 years ago
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 1 time
LaCN vs GLADS
We in LaCN tried to avoid war this era but GLADS have pushed us over the edge and now we are declaring WAR on GLADS for their oppressive behavior in KOC. We have tried to get along with all but Dank sabbing our members unprovoked and sending massers against TGF and others for no reason but he didn't like the stats of a player is reprehensible. It is therefore that the leaders of LaCN declare war on GLADS.
originally in thread titled LaCN vs GLADS
originally in thread titled LaCN vs GLADS
Spiderwoman aka Kokyanwuhti in Hopi, creator & weaver of life, the great teacher, sacred guardian, overseeing the welfare of all those in need to southwestern Native American cultures.
- Screwy
- Player
- Posts: 57
- Joined: 5 years ago
- Location: Bulgaria, Shumen
- Has thanked: 9 times
- Been thanked: 6 times
Re: LaCN vs GLADS
In general Dank is an Ass and played dumb for quite some time sending massers on TGF cause he is upset losing another war lol.
originally in thread titled LaCN vs GLADS
Code: Select all
31 minutes ago Dank raid Attack defended 252 1,526 8,859,294,733 8,032,516,365 2019-07-23 17:02:28
31 minutes ago Dank raid Attack defended 430 2,551 9,038,211,873 8,374,175,243 2019-07-23 17:02:23
31 minutes ago Dank raid 225,760 Gold stolen 373 1,991 7,907,317,417 8,124,123,222 2019-07-23 17:02:19
32 minutes ago Dank raid Attack defended 75 511 9,086,005,260 7,305,884,084 2019-07-23 17:02:15
32 minutes ago Dank raid Attack defended 75 511 8,718,294,597 7,089,390,713 2019-07-23 17:02:11
32 minutes ago Dank raid Attack defended 259 1,539 9,917,351,383 9,141,267,027 2019-07-23 17:02:05
32 minutes ago Dank raid Attack defended 264 1,541 7,985,713,710 7,475,680,906 2019-07-23 17:02:01
32 minutes ago Dank raid Attack defended 79 514 8,960,517,498 7,579,720,761 2019-07-23 17:01:57
32 minutes ago Dank raid Attack defended 396 2,578 9,048,915,518 7,568,219,552 2019-07-23 17:01:54
32 minutes ago Dank raid Attack defended 374 2,068 8,394,290,055 8,254,224,467 2019-07-23 17:01:50
32 minutes ago Dank raid Attack defended 190 1,035 7,919,837,593 7,892,876,685 2019-07-23 17:01:47
32 minutes ago Dank raid Attack defended 73 517 9,668,574,786 7,463,230,087 2019-07-23 17:01:43
32 minutes ago Dank raid Attack defended 321 2,076 9,427,655,744 7,888,397,856 2019-07-23 17:01:40
32 minutes ago Dank raid Attack defended 91 519 8,621,474,758 8,258,705,026 2019-07-23 17:01:37
32 minutes ago Dank raid 129,233 Gold stolen 386 1,815 8,301,018,049 9,524,292,541 2019-07-23 17:01:34
32 minutes ago Dank raid Attack defended 73 520 8,826,690,709 6,694,986,034 2019-07-23 17:01:30
32 minutes ago Dank raid Attack defended 237 1,565 9,488,524,450 7,710,087,725 2019-07-23 17:01:27
33 minutes ago Dank raid Attack defended 80 522 8,662,074,846 7,155,896,499 2019-07-23 17:01:25
33 minutes ago Dank raid Attack defended 342 2,093 9,124,039,182 7,990,621,626 2019-07-23 17:01:22
33 minutes ago Dank raid Attack defended 375 2,098 9,445,118,846 9,033,137,724 2019-07-23 17:01:20
33 minutes ago Dank raid 212,505 Gold stolen 196 972 8,040,953,579 8,687,106,234 2019-07-23 17:01:17
33 minutes ago Dank raid Attack defended 85 525 8,984,835,922 7,827,716,488 2019-07-23 17:01:14
33 minutes ago Dank raid Attack defended 323 2,107 9,883,892,886 8,094,384,453 2019-07-23 17:01:11
33 minutes ago Dank raid Attack defended 268 1,583 9,035,970,666 8,167,721,134 2019-07-23 17:01:08
33 minutes ago Dank raid Attack defended 257 1,586 9,010,000,533 7,751,353,302 2019-07-23 17:01:06
33 minutes ago Dank raid Attack defended 469 2,652 9,494,829,805 8,897,614,359 2019-07-23 17:01:04
33 minutes ago Dank raid Attack defended 171 1,062 9,457,231,723 8,045,583,416 2019-07-23 17:01:01
33 minutes ago Dank raid Attack defended 343 2,128 9,660,041,193 8,201,421,098 2019-07-23 17:00:59
33 minutes ago Dank raid Attack defended 247 1,599 9,624,604,380 7,807,725,499 2019-07-23 17:00:56
33 minutes ago Dank raid Attack defended 277 1,602 9,702,514,298 8,749,136,619 2019-07-23 17:00:54
33 minutes ago Dank raid Attack defended 448 2,679 10,066,554,901 8,767,028,851 2019-07-23 17:00:51
33 minutes ago Dank raid Attack defended 314 2,148 10,459,876,983 7,929,310,416 2019-07-23 17:00:49
33 minutes ago Dank raid Attack defended 353 2,153 9,964,211,976 8,459,564,340 2019-07-23 17:00:46
33 minutes ago Dank raid Attack defended 244 1,617 9,806,105,550 7,645,953,319 2019-07-23 17:00:43
34 minutes ago Dank raid Attack defended 474 2,704 9,865,656,369 8,895,926,309 2019-07-23 17:00:37